Progress in Pediatric Cardiology
Volume 32, Issue 2 , Pages 89-96, December 2011

Professionalism in support of pediatric cardio-thoracic surgery: A case of a bright young surgeon

  • James W. Pichert

      Affiliations

    • Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
    • Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy, 2135 Blakemore Avenue, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
  • ,
  • James A. Johns

      Affiliations

    • Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
    • Division of Pediatric Cardiology, 5230 Doctors' Office Tower, Monroe Carell, Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, 2200 Children's Way, Nashville, TN 37232-9119, USA
  • ,
  • Gerald B. Hickson

      Affiliations

    • Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
    • Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy, 2135 Blakemore Avenue, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2135 Blakemore Avenue, Nashville, TN 37212, USA. Tel.: +1 615 343 4500; fax: +1 615 343 8580.

Abstract 

Effective teamwork is critical to successful outcomes in pediatric cardiac surgery. Unfortunately, lapses in professional performance and conduct by those who treat pediatric cardiac patients pose threats to quality and safety. One hallmark of a profession is self regulation. Therefore, healthcare leaders need specific means for identifying and addressing those lapses and indicators of unsafe systems or individuals. This article describes an initial “near miss” event involving a pediatric cardiac surgeon. While fictional, the case represents a composite of events involving several pediatric cardiac surgeons who practice at different medical centers throughout the U.S.

Research shows that patient complaints are significantly associated with physicians' risk management activity and lawsuits. Research also demonstrates that a small subset of physicians and surgeons in various areas of practice are associated with disproportionate shares of patient complaints. Coded and aggregated patient complaint data therefore offer a metric for identifying and promoting behavior change. Analysis of the distribution of patient complaints associated with 41 pediatric cardiac surgeons is presented as a means for helping leaders show one surgeon how her/his risk status compares with peers'. The paper describes a specific plan and reliable process by which medical group/center colleagues and leaders may: 1) address lapses in professionalism and performance; 2) follow-up to promote professionalism, professional accountability, quality, and a safety culture; and 3) reduce risk.

Keywords: Professionalism, Safety culture, Risk management, Cardiac surgery, Patient satisfaction, Peer review

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 10.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No external financial support was provided for the conduct of the research and/or preparation of this article. The authors were the only persons involved in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

PII: S1058-9813(11)00063-4

doi:10.1016/j.ppedcard.2011.10.006

Progress in Pediatric Cardiology
Volume 32, Issue 2 , Pages 89-96, December 2011